
Therapy is made up of 20% content and 80% the process. The 1st two sessions are spent listening to the client’s stories which form the content of the therapy. Effectiveness in therapy comes with true understanding of the context – how client interpret key developmental events in fixed patterns & precipitating factors at the onset of maladaptive behaviors, etc.
For Adjustment Disorder, 12 to 15 sessions will be deemed sufficient. Intensive and frequent sessions will be structured in the early days of therapy, perhaps twice weekly and subsequently to reduce to monthly session for maintenance.
At some point, the therapist is to lead and control the session. If client is unstructured, such as becoming tardy in his attendance, such behavior will be viewed as treatment issue if it happens regularly. There is a place for therapist to define and control (stay on top) of how the therapy is to take shape. If the client fails to show up, it is ok to call him/her but not to pursue.
Homework is a necessary part of treatment and following-up with it is mandatory unless the client has more urgent issue to attend to.
Case Management –
Dr Ng recommended note-taking in the following manner:
Subjective (Client’s expression of himself or herself)
1. Client’s anxious.
2.
3.
4.
Objective (Therapist’s assessement)
1. C’s stuck in his/her …
2.
3.
4.
Action (Therapist’s intervention)
1. Referred client to IMH
2.
3.
4.
Plan (Homework for next session)
1.
2.
3.
4.
The therapy should provide a structure that is stable yet flexible. The 1st thing to find out will be how, why, how frequent the problem occurs. The CBT (12-step and solution-focused) comes into play after that. Therapist must seek to know the larger system (the support group).
Dr Ng touched on 6 constructive innovations in counseling:
1. Negotiating meanings – redefining and redirecting – the client’s unique view of meaning
2. Inquiring to conceptualize from a ‘not knowing’ stance by questioning.
3. Focusing on competence and resourcefulness of client. What works?
4. Eliciting & inviting – ‘How can I help in this regard?’
5. Client’s preference – Client’s theory of change. Unwavering focus.
6. Co-signifying audience – ‘intended audience’
The class watched 2 video clips on addiction and eating disorder. We were divided into 4 groups to approach the cases using our preferred modality. I joined the Redecision group and had a good time conceptualizing the case and detailing treatment plan.
The representatives shared the work of groups and I revisited the concepts and techniques of CP & PP.
Dr Ng was impressed by the depth and breath we have on our preferred modality.