
Artwork (c)2006, www.psychotherapy.net
Introduction
In Redecision Therapy (RT) the client experiences the child part of self and creates fantasy scenes. By integrating the cognitive framework of Transactional Analysis (TA) Theory (Berne, 1958) and affective principles and processes of Gestalt Theory (Perls, 1951), client can be helped to safely give up the constricting decisions he made in childhood. (Mary & Robert Goulding, 1979)
< To Give Up or Not To Give Up >
Marie, 37, had filed for divorce but was troubled by her own decision. Prior to her legal action, Marie noticed her husband, Judd (49), a sales executive, behaving strangely, such as bringing his handphone with him into the shower and returning home in the wee hours. She had a nasty feeling that her husband had snapped back to his former adulterous living again.
Marie was incensed when Judd confessed that he was madly in love with a married Chinese colleague. When confronted, Judd rebutted coldly, “you are no longer sexually appealing to me, I have no choice but to find someone else.” [Judd played the PROSECUTOR role in Mind Game– ‘Look what you have done to me.’ – You are not OK.] (Berne, 1964) Marie was devastated and in her words, “it felt like a thunderbolt.”
Marie had been losing sleep over Judd’s increasing absence from home. Most nights she would cry herself to sleep. Her demands for his attention were reciprocated with more hostility. Marie became forgetful and experienced mood-swings. Ironically, in the quiet of the nights, beneath the torments brought about by her husband (the first and only man in her life), she still yearned for his love and touch. She felt desperate, not knowing how to continue in a love-less marriage.
Even after she had filed for divorce, Marie would still pine for affectionate messages from Judd. He had indicated in one of his messages, ‘perhaps it’s good for us to go separate way now. But who knows, I may come back for you someday and we can re-marry. Just don’t let any man touch you until then.’ [Playing the role of RESCUER – ‘What would you do without me?’ - You are not OK.] Ironically, Marie was both infuriated by his selfish thoughts and gladden by his show of jealousy.
Case history - Past problems
In the first eleven years of their marriage, to the external world, theirs was the ideal picture of a perfect family— loving and contented parents with a happy child. Marie, being 12 years younger than Judd, looked up to him as a decent and loving partner. On the other hand as Marie is more resourceful and stable in her income, Judd deferred every financial decision to her. She was seen as a confident and decisive person, adored by her late mother and well-respected by her students and friends.
The year after Marie’s parents passed away, i.e., 2002, Judd began a series of extra-marital affairs. The latter was remorseful after the 1st affair and promised to stay faithful. The delighted Marie bought him a car. In December 2005, Marie found out Judd was seeing 4 women (2 Philippinas & 2 Malay ladies). Marie was indignant and perplexed by the drastic change in Judd. Their relationship deteriorated to cold wars.
Heart-broken and depressed, Marie popped in 30 panadols in an attempt to end her life. Judd stopped their only son (16), Jayden, from seeking help and threatened to punch the latter.
On another occasion Jayden saw his father accessing pornography websites and confronted him. Judd was upset and both ended up in a heated argument. Marie was disgusted by the faulty role-modelling of Judd especially when the latter would approach the son and licked his face. Jayden’s school grades had dived. The class teacher had commented that Jayden looked downcast in school.
Therapeutic Contracts
Eric Berne (1966) defined a TA contract as ‘an explicit bilateral commitment to a well-defined course of action.’ TA assumes that people have the capacity to think and make decisions. As the Redecision Therapist, I helped Marie identify what she wanted (Therapeutic Contract transcript - Appendix 3) and how she could use her resources to achieve her goals. It is a contract for change Marie made with herself after she had closed her escape hatches such as taking her own life or harming others. Her escape hatches were closed by Adult decisions: ‘to live and take care of myself’ ‘and let others live and take care of themselves.’
Appendix 3
THERAPEUTIC CONTRACT TRANSCRIPT
Redecision Therapist: What do you want to change?
Marie: I am unable to stay focus in my work.
RT: What specifically do you want to change now?
M: I want to get out of the sadness that plagues me daily.
(M is seeking Symptomatic Relief.)
RT: What needs to happen for you to make this change?
M: I need to give up clinging on to the rotten marriage and move on.
(M is seeking Script Cure – to move permanently and substantially out of SCRIPT patterns.)
RT: What are you willing to do in order to make this change?
M: I will talk about my problems, experiences and memories to gain an understanding of my thoughts, feelings and behaviours in this meaningless relationship that is heading for a divorce. (Soft Contract)
RT: How might you sabotage yourself?
M: By telling myself that `I am not good enough’ or `I can’t survive without Judd.’
RT: How will you and I know when you have made the change?
M: When I report to you that I am no longer feeling sad.
(James, 1976)
Treatment Plan for Redecision Therapy
Transactional Analysis
In RT, the primary question is: What early childhood decisions are causing problems today. As Eric Berne first noted, a client’s current problem is often the result of injunctions and decisions stemming from childhood.
A useful way of diagnosing Marie was to assess her ego-states. Ego-states, in Berne’s definition of the term, were the building blocks of the Structure of Personality (Berne, 1961). Parent and Child were both echoes of the past. Adult was a response to the here-and-now, using the person’s grown-up resources. All three states entailed thinking, feeling and behaviours. (Stewart & Joines, 2003) RT seeks to re-programme the Parent, de-contaminate the Adult and de-confuse the Child. What ego-state strengths can Marie muster to make contractual changes and how well can Marie sustain these changes once they are made?
When Judd criticized Marie for not being sexually appealing enough, the latter went on a slimming programme to look shapely. But when Judd commented she looked too thin, she regained her weight right away. [Playing the role of VICTIM - ‘Poor me.’ – I am not OK.] - Marie paid more attention to her own faults and flaws (coming from her Critical Parent ego) than to her assets and successes. Marie needed to learn to nurture herself (Nurturing Parent ego) rather than self-criticized. One of her contracts was to learn to love herself wisely by doing things that would promote personal growth. To model positive nurturing, I must give Marie positive strokes for growth or change, as well as for ‘just being’.
Marie’s Adult, or thinking part, had been contaminated. A Parental contamination stood in the way of achieving a contract, it needed to be resolved. Marie was very close to her mother and was well-compensated by her mother’s love so much so she did not feel the need for fatherly love. For years, her father was aggressive and violent towards her mother and her. He broadcasted his affairs with other women without blinking his eyes. Marie’s mother was deeply upset but did not protest, instead accepted it as ‘fate’.
However, the young Marie had often heard her mother sobbing uncontrollably in the middle of the night. In the day her mother would escape to the gambling den with Marie in tow. That suited Marie fine as she resented her father and would not stay a minute longer in his presence. On the other hand, she felt sorry for her mother and vowed in her heart to do anything to please her, even at the expense of her own happiness and convenience.
There seemed a Structural Pathology of double contamination from the Parent (P) and the Child (C) ego-states. Marie re-played a Parental Slogan, agreed to it with an Adapted (Compliant) Child belief, and mistook both for reality:
Mother (P): ‘Resign to your fate. Hang in there. Be pleasing and you will be ok.’ Paired with
Marie (C): ‘Like mum, I’ll keep my anger and resentment to myself. I will make Mum happy by not giving up.’
(2nd Order Structural Analysis – Appendix not available)
Script Analysis
Berne defined a Script as a personal life plan decided upon by each individual at an early age; in respect of the interpretation of external events. (Steiner, 1974) Two-chair technique was used to conduct the Script Questionnaire (Appendix 5) to elicit drivers and injunctions from her parents.
Appendix 5
Script Questionnaire (Jeff & Margaret White)
(A)
Set up 2 chairs, one for Marie and one for her parent (mother) figure:
Mother: `I am most happy with you when you stay close to me. (Driver)
* * *
Marie: When I was little, my mother was most upset when I give up trying. (Injunction)
Marie: When I saw mother upset, I felt guilty, sad and remorseful.
Marie: When I felt this way, I kept quiet and sulked.
Marie: (The theme of my mother’s life) - She suffered in silence.
(B)
Set up 2 chairs, one for Marie and one for her parent (father) figure:
Father: `I am most happy with you when you obey. (Driver)
* * *
Marie: When I was little, my father was most upset when I made mistakes. (Injunction)
Marie: When I saw father upset, I felt frightened and resentful.
Marie: When I felt this way, I stayed away from my father.
Marie: (The theme of my father’s life) - He was chauvinistic and selfish.
Marie’s script matrix - Appendix 6)
Drivers –
From father: Be perfect/Try Hard From mother: Be close/Be pleasing
Drivers come from the Parent ego-states of our parents. Marie’s father flared up each time Marie made a mistake. She would take cover by following her mother to the gambling den. She knew by staying close to mother made the latter happy.
Injunctions –
From father: Don’t express/Don’t be close/Don’t be important
From mother: Don’t give up/Don’t be you/Don’t think
Whenever her father went into a rage, Marie would be reduced to tears (The Adapted Child). She would be prohibited from explaining herself. Marie found herself also being restricted by her mother’s injunctions of ‘Don’t think, Don’t be you and Don’t give up’ which came from a threatened position. Such injunctions stifled and confused Marie in her sense of judgment and decision-making. In order for Marie to be free from the injunctions, she must be able to make a new Decision.
Rackets Analysis
Rackets are repetitions of
which were stroked in the past. They are expressed each time a real feeling is about to emerge. (English, 1972) Rackets usually come from early child decisions. (Racket System - Appendix 7)
Appendix 7
Marie’s Racket System
Script Belief / Feelings:
Self - I am unlovable. (Core)
Husband goes for other women. (Supporting)
Others - Men in general sexually `objectified’ women. But they
would return to their spouses. (Core)
Men visit the prostitutes to gratify their sexual need
only. (Supporting)
Quality of life - Life is harsh and miserable. (Core)
I am not good enough. I will keep trying. (Supporting)
Rackety Displays:
Observable Behaviours - Unable to focus at work. Sulk. Insomnia.
Reported Internal Experiences - Heart palpitations/loss of appetite/feeling miserable/loss of zeal
Fantasies - Son would remain single to take care of her / Husband would return to re-marry her / Husband would pass on STD to her
Reinforcing Memories: - Marie sleeps with her son and cries herself to sleep/Re-reads Judd’s sms-es
Permitted Feeling: Sadness and Grief
Repressed Feelings: Resentment and Anger
Marie’s racket feeling was scared (SCARED) and sadness (SAD) and prohibited feeling was resentment and anger (MAD).
The racket and prohibited feelings were displayed during a session. Marie recalled one of the many selfish requests Judd made. It was also at this juncture she gave out a Gallows Laughter to reinforce her pathology (overwhelming sense of sadness).
RT: What was the laughter about?
Marie: He pleaded with me to go through the vaginoplasty surgery to gratify his sexual desire.
RT: You were tickled by his proposal?
Marie (in exasperation): “I kept quiet but wondered what next?!”
Marie began to realize even if she were to go ahead with the surgery, she might not be able to stop Judd from seeing other women. After I had gone over the Racket Analysis with her, she became acutely aware of feeling and behaviour patterns.
Marie (relented in tears): “I resented him for treating me as a sexual object.” (She was made to repeat thrice in an emphatic tone.)
Marie’s Impasse
“I want to get out of my unhappy marriage.” “But I don’t really want to give him up.”
Gouldings emphasized Perls’ belief that when a client is ‘STUCK’ with a problem, this indicates that two parts of his personality is pushing in opposite directions with equal force. The net result of the above led Marie to nowhere in spite using a great deal of energy. The resolution to treat the above IMPASSE was to help Marie make a REDECISION.
Marie had a second degree Impasse with Impasse present within her Child (C2). There was subconscious conflict exists between P1 and C1. She was modeled ‘not to give up’ by her mother despite having miserable marital relationship. She complied with the injunctions of her parents from her Child as her Early Decision was “I am not worthy. I will do whatever you say. I will never give up trying to please you.”
Two-Chair technique (Early Scene Work)
Redecision had to be made within the Free Child Ego State of Marie’s C2
by A1 between the young Marie’s Child (C1) and the fantasized Child of Marie’s mother that gave the injunction. Using the two-chair technique, Marie was facilitated to go back to the early scene (to the scene when the young Marie was lying in bed next to her sobbing mother) so that she could contact her unexpressed feelings and sought permission to break her impasse - ‘to give up trying and move on’.
Marie (the child): “Mum, it hurts to see you cry.”
RT: “Be your mother and give permission.”
(Mother): “You may give up when it hurts too much, dear.”
Marie: “I am hurt too much. I want to give up the rotten marriage.” “I can give up. I can move on.”
(At this juncture, Marie remained silent for a full minute. There was no shedding of tears and in her words, ‘I felt a brick lifted off my chest.’) (Symptomatic Relief)
During Adult Debriefing, Marie was helped to anchor the scene of resolution and make adult plan for herself to feel, think and do differently about her future. (Moving towards the Script Cure)
Conclusion
Redecision is a beginning rather than an ending. Marie’s contracts to change were achieved in the brief therapy. Her new found sense of control was obvious when she moved out of her matrimonial home with her son even before her divorce was made absolute. The therapy had empowered her to begin a new and happy Script without Judd.
It is OK to Give Up when it Hurts too much.
(1798 words)
References
Berne, E. (1958). Transactional Analysis: A new and effective method of group therapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 12, 735-43.
Berne, E. (1961). Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy. New York : Grove Press
Berne, E. (1964). Games People Play. New York : Random House Ballantine Book
James, M., & Jongeward, D. (1978). Born to win. Boston : Signet
Goulding M.M. & Goulding R.L. (1997). Changing Lives through
Redecision Therapy. New York : Grove Press
Perls, F. (1951). Gestalt Therapy: Excitement and Growth in the Human Personality ISBN 0-939266-24-5
Steiner, C. (1974). Scripts People Live: Transactional Analysis of Life Scripts. New york : Grove Press
Stewart, I., & Joines, V. (2003). TA Today. England : Russell Press